| Applicant | Watershed Organization Trust | Application ID: | 21 |
| Status: | Approved Accepted | Review Cycle end date: | 2007-01-17 |
The rating and comment reflect the reviewer's opinion of the project's potential for success, though we need to see the diversity of the reviewers and their rating style across projects.
The rating is a number from 1 (Poor) to 10 (Excellent).
Note that it is difficult to compare applications due to their diversity, and therefore the comment provides a very important context to the number. It reflects the reviewer’s thoughts and recommendations regarding this application; why they feel this project will or will not be successful.
Gandhi said that a nation should be evaulated by how it treats its animals and i like your inclusion of animal consumption needs.
It should get the funds applied for since the survey result shows they are in dire need of water.
To track and see the status of the project after 3-5 years setting up of a follow-up program is advisable. It can be on a simple spreadsheet recording the dates of chlorination, annual cleaning, repair of wears and tears, costs, number of beneficieries that fluctuate over time, etc.
| Applicant | :   | Watershed Organization Trust |
| Status | : | Approved Accepted |
| Country | : | INDIA |
| Amount Funded | :   | $6,218 |
| Funded By:- | ||
| Blue Planet Network | : | $6,218 |
Funds Used |
: | $6,218 |
Funds Available |
: | $0 |
| Start Date | : | 2007-04-01 |
| Completion Date | : | 2008-01-31 |
| Date of Last Update | : |