The rating and comment reflect the reviewer's opinion of the project's potential for success, though we need to see the diversity of the reviewers and their rating style across projects.
The rating is a number from 1 (Poor) to 10 (Excellent).
Note that it is difficult to compare applications due to their diversity, and therefore the comment provides a very important context to the number. It reflects the reviewer’s thoughts and recommendations regarding this application; why they feel this project will or will not be successful.
During and after project implementation, would like to see learnings coming out of the integration with NGOs and government, especially details on how challenges dealt with by many water programs (ie, achieving full payment) are addressed. What works, what doesn't?
solid intervention and hope to learn from it
See previous page
Great project and i hope the learnings get shared, so that even the components can be of use to other smaller, more focused projects.
Looks like a good project.
Did not finish Review
| Applicant | :   | Protos |
| Status | : | Approved Accepted |
| Country | : | UGANDA (map) |
| Amount Funded | :   | $25,700 |
| Funded By:- | ||
| Blue Planet Network | : | $25,700 |
Funds Used |
: | $25,700 |
Funds Available |
: | $0 |
| Number of Projects | : | 1 |
| Overall Start Date | : | 2007-09-01 |
| Overall Completion Date | : | 2009-09-30 |
| Date of Last Update | : | Thu Jul 31 00:00:00 -0700 2008 |