| Applicant | El Porvenir | Application ID: | 188 |
| Status: | Approved Accepted | Review Cycle end date: | 2009-08-29 |
PWX members can use this space to discuss elements of the App. PWX members can post questions or comments and they will be seen by everybody. Any PWX member can respond to the questions and comments, not just the submitter.
By Carolyn Meub of Pure Water for the World Posted almost 3 years ago
it would seem these people would benefit more from water improvement first. why not tackle this problem first?
Byron
By Jenna Saldaña of El Porvenir Posted almost 3 years ago
Hello Byron,
If you improve the water source without constructing latrines, the water has a great risk of contamination because of the lack of sanitation facilities. We encourage communities to build latrines first, but it is always up to the community to determine the projects.
Jenna
By Carolyn Meub of Pure Water for the World Posted almost 3 years ago
improving the water source with bio-sand filter or nano- membrane filtration will provide homes with the ability to create safe water for less than $50 each. This would stop the intestinal distress and allow people the time to deal with other issues. We are 70% water, in my mind water is more important than any other issue, but that's just me. Byron
By Jenna Saldaña of El Porvenir Posted almost 3 years ago
Different ways of approaching the same problem. Our perspective is that if you have people using the bathroom all around where they live, there is a significant health problem caused that filtering water cannot solve.
By Rajesh Shah of Peer Water Exchange Posted almost 3 years ago
I have asked this question to others and there has not been an answer.
Clearly, addressing sanitation will reduce water contamination, thus improving water quality.
However, my observation is that even with people's fecal matter reduced (or eliminated) there is a large amount generated by animals, livestock which are abundant in these village settings.
How much threat do they possess?
How do we handle that?
General question - not particularly addressed to this application.
Rajesh
By Rob Bell of El Porvenir Posted almost 3 years ago
I am no expert in animal vs human fecal matter, but my understanding is that the danger is much less from animal fecal matter. In fact, animal fecal matter (and human for that matter) is excellent fertilizer.
However, I leave it open to others to correct and enlighten me on this one...
Rob
By Rajesh Shah of Peer Water Exchange Posted almost 3 years ago
To reduce review time only one of a similar group of applications is being reviewed.
The fate of this application is linked to a very similar one by EP:
http://peerwater.org/apps/189
| Applicant | :   | El Porvenir |
| Status | : | Approved Accepted |
| Country | : | NICARAGUA (map) |
| Amount Funded | :   | $11,514 |
| Funded By:- | ||
| Blue Planet Network | : | $11,514 |
Funds Used |
: | $11,514 |
Funds Available |
: | $0 |
| Start Date | : | 2009-09-01 |
| Completion Date | : | 2009-12-31 |
| Date of Last Update | : |