: ACI Center for WASH Training & Launch of 10 new Local Businesses

Applicant Aqua Clara International Plan ID: 315
Status: approved_accepted Review Cycle end date: 2010-08-26

Discussion Forum

By A Single Drop Posted on Fri 30 Jul 2010, almost 16 years ago

We work with the BSF as well and am glad to hear that you have are approaching the implementation of the filters using a social entrepreneurial approach. Can you tell me a little more about the WASH Education and outreach strategy? If yes, can you tell me a little more about how you do it and what your mechanism for outreach looks like?

Also, how much time and how intensive do you get when you are helping them build a micro-business? do you supply start up costs? If yes, how much? Do you offer micro-business development training? Do you find that the groups you work with have those skills?

How many of your programs are income-generating? If it is a micro-business, where does the profit go? Is the filter affordable? do you have a program for those who can't afford it?

Lastly, I think it's great that you have a training center. How do the people you train start their microbusinesses? Do you supply all the start-up costs? How do you vet those groups to whom you invest?

good luck!
Gemma Bulos
A Single Drop

Implementer Info

By A Single Drop Posted on Fri 30 Jul 2010, almost 16 years ago

Sorry, I had one last question. Can I learn more about the implementers? What is ACIs role? Are you a trainer, funder, and or implementer?

Implementer Info

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Mon 02 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Thanks for your questions and comments Gemma. ACI is an implementer that focuses on training local people in the communities in which we work. Our WASH education and outreach strategy is and will continue to be run by our local oversight staff and Community Health Workers (CHW). The CHWs currently meet with all existing and new filter users on a monthly basis, providing further training on filter maintenance, filter use, safe water storage and related hygiene. The CHWs also oversee 4 school communities and attend events, barassas (Chief's meetings) etc to raise awareness about the ACI program in their area. We hope that this outreach can be further developed with the addition of the WASH training center which we are calling our H2Ope center.

Launching a new filter producing social business can be fairly time intensive as there is a lot of material to cover. Besides the filter construction training itself, there is also significant training on tracking and reporting etc. The skill levels of the people we work with vary quite considerably, but we have endeavored to make the training accessible and often work alongside a translator. ACI provides the initial supply of raw materials for the first 50 filters, the income from which provides the money to purchase the materials for the next 50 and so on. The selling price for the filters is set at 1,070 Kenyan Shillings (currently $13) which includes 250 Kenyan shillings (~$3) as the installation and maintenance fee for the filter constructing business. The remaining 820 Kenyan Shillings are paid back to ACI to purchase the next order of raw materials. We have found this rolling loan system to be very effective.

All of our projects in the Kisii region are income generating. ACI have conducted household surveys and focus groups in the area and the feedback has indicated that the filter is affordable. The majority of the filter purchasers are around the $2/day or slightly below income level. Firewood and charcoal are both scarce and expensive in this area and people have reported substantial cost savings since using the ACI filter.

With regards to vetting the groups that we work with, we have a number of procedures. When ACI expands the program into a new community, the local chiefs, leaders and community nominate a community member to be their designated filter producer. ACI then holds a meeting with the nominated filter producer and a representative from the local school where ACI's expectations are clearly defined. It is then optional for the nominated filter constructer to sign an MOU with ACI. The filter constructing businesses are based out of schools as this provides secure storage for the raw materials. The school representatives provide some oversight of the filter constructer and also report to the ACI regional coordinator on a monthly basis.

Hope this answers your questions!
Claire

Hiring one additional full time employee.

By Tanzania Mission to the Poor and Disabled (PADI) Posted on Mon 09 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

In your proposal you have explained that you will hire one additional full time employee to help fully coordinate continual training, will he/she be paid salary? Which source of the salary comes from? How are you going to maintain his /her salary? Is the part time also paid allowance or not?
Regards
Msigwa

Hiring one additional full time employee.

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Mon 09 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Msigwa,
Thank you for your questions. As detailed in our budget, the full time employee and the part-time employee will be paid salary for a 12 month period. Their main roles will be scaling up the program, coordinating the training and providing oversight. We have core funding to support the part time employee after the initial 12 month period. We need the full time employee during the initial scaling phase as this will require significant time to put training procedures, oversight mechanisms etc in place as well awareness raising.
Best wishes,
Claire

Water testing

By Blue Planet Network Posted on Thu 12 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi,

In your budget you have 3,100 for setting up a testing laboratory and additional for testing kit consumables. Can you give a bit more detail about this lab:
- more budget details (equipment v facility v operating headcount)?
- Is it mobile?
- What is the operating plan: how and how frequently with samples be taken?

Would a filter plan such as in A Single Drop 's Uganda application be an acceptable alternative?

Thanks,
Rajesh

Water testing

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Tue 17 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Rajesh,

The lab that we will use is the Oxfam DelAgua Portable Testing Kit. This is a mobile water testing lab that will be used primarily for ACI's work in the Rigoma Market/Keroka area, but will also be used for monitoring some of our nearby projects. The testing kit is appropriate for the type of project that we are running as it does not require electricity and is specifically designed for field use. The kit will be set up in one of the rooms in the Hope Center which is secure and centrally located. The tests will be run by one of our Kenyan staff or a Kenyan graduate student.

As you will see from the proposal and budget, ACI will also use a portable Hach turbidometer. ACI follows CAWST's biosand filter testing guidelines and assesses the biosand filters according to the 8 normal operating conditions. Turbidity is one of these key indicators. This is a cost effective way of testing the biosand filters that also provides meaningful results. According to the CAWST guidelines for a large biosand project (greater than 100 filters), it is appropriate to test 5-10% of the filters using a random sampling procedure - ACI will follow this recommendation. Revisiting every filter such as the approach taken by A Single Drop would be very costly for a program such as ours which will have significantly more filters. Our approach is to use an effective monitoring and sampling procedure that will give us a good overall picture of how well the filters are being constructed, used and maintained and then to adjust and improve the program according to the results. The sample size will grow as the program expands. At present we are on our way to exceed 1,000 filters in the Kisii region by the end of the year.

ACI's approach in this project will be to conduct household surveys, focus groups and water testing on a tri-annual basis. ACI will continue to use the LQAS random sampling procedure. The surveys will be conducted by the ACI Community Health Workers who will also collect the water tests. Turbidity tests (input and output samples) will be carried out on all filters surveyed. Full bacteriological tests (input, output and stored water) will be carried out on a smaller subset of the sample. In keeping with the recommendation of testing 5-10% of the filters, this will work out to 50-100 tests per monitoring round depending on the number of filters at that given time. This will also include a double and a blank test to ensure quality control on each testing day.

Best wishes,
Claire

Impact numbers

By Blue Planet Network Posted on Thu 12 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi,

I tend to be more conservative on the impact numbers. Maybe only 7-8 of your 10 potential business with take off. And then they may take time to get the market penetration you seek.

Hope you achieve your numbers!

Rajesh

Impact numbers

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Mon 16 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Rajesh,
Great question. We know from experience that not all of the businesses that we launch take off and a lot of the success depends on the motivation of the filter constructor and the demand from the local community. If after 4-6 months a business is not showing signs of growth, ACI moves the tools and materials for filter construction to a nearby filter producing group that is growing at a faster pace. ACI intentionally trains around 10 filter producing groups at a time to enable this movement of materials, while also ensuring that ACI staff time is best used and not dependent on the success of one individual group. So even if only 7-8 of the filter producing groups take off, we still believe that we will achieve our numbers using this approach.
Best wishes,
Claire

Response to a Rating & Comment

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Wed 18 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Peer Reviewers,

I would like to respond to a comment that was posted on the 'Ratings and Comments' section of this proposal. Unfortunately, the reviewer did not ask the question on this section as we would have been able to answer it in advance of the review. The comment stated that we did not have enough market research to ensure that the filters would be bought.

This proposal is based on an expansion of our program in the Kisii area. ACI provided the first 22 filters during our training sessions in June 2009. Since then, over 550 filters have been sold for a profit without a subsidy in the area and there are orders for many more. This is sound evidence that there is a demand for the filters and that people are prepared to pay for them. In addition, our program monitoring has shown that people consider the filter to be affordable and provide sufficient water for their household use. We will continue to do market research as the program grows and will make improvements and adjustments to our approach as we gather data.

I look forward to continuing to answer any questions that you may have about the proposal and wish you all well in this funding round,

Best wishes,
Claire

Response to a Rating & Comment

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Tue 24 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi all,

One further response to a comment put forward in the 'Rating and Comment' section. According to our budget, the producers are initially supplied with materials for their first 50 sales which includes filters and tapped safe water storage containers. The material costs for the filters are around $10 and the cost of the tapped safe water storage containers is around $3, hence the $6500 requested for the first 500 sales.

The $3 profit for the sale of each filter is paid by the purchasing household and is obviously not requested in this proposal. Along with the material costs of the filter, this brings the selling price to $13. $10 goes back into the resupply fund.

The tapped safe water storage containers are separate from the sale of the filters and it is up to the end user if they choose to purchase this in addition to or separately from an ACI water filter.

Hope this clarifies the issue raised!

Best,
Claire

Independent service organization monitors?

By Team Blue Posted on Fri 06 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Claire,
Well thought through proposal, exhibits and Q&A responses. Support of schools, community and government seems clear on a village by village basis. Would involvement of a local club from an international service organization like Rotary add consistency to the monitoring process and possibly accelerate the rate of progress in expanding the project to other village/towns in the service clubs broader geographic area? In this case, the closest apparent Rotary club to Rigoma Market Centre near Kisii appears to be in Kisumu the site of the closest airport. As you know, Rotary's Service Above Self motto comes alive at the local level with programs such as you propose here.
Roger

Independent service organization monitors?

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Mon 09 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Roger,
Thanks for your comments and questions. Your idea about working with Rotary is very interesting. As you may know, our project in the Kisii region began through a connection with Don Howard, a Rotarian from Colorado. We currently share some staff with his project. What sort of assistance would Rotary be able to provide in terms of monitoring? I think you are correct that Kisumu is the closest Rotary Club to Rigoma Market/Keroka and I have contacted Don to find out if there are any clubs that are closer. We have run a pilot training in Meru and it is likely that this will be one of our next areas of expansion after the Kisii region. There is a Rotary Club in Meru and it would be very helpful to have Rotary support in launching and assisting with oversight in that region.
Best wishes,
Claire

Independent service organization monitors?

By Team Blue Posted on Mon 09 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Claire,
As I'm just beginning to get an understanding about the scale and importance of the world's water and sanitation problem, I can't avoid thinking about solutions of the scale that we involved with Rotary's aggressive international approach to nearly solving the world's polio challenges. An approach with attracted Bill Gates comment that "Rotarians get things done" and several donations totaling $350 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
However, even someone with my basic level of understanding can appreciate that water and sanitation issues are much more complicated than polio issues. Clearly they require committed local followup to insure that investments in projects have the maximum potential to reach the desired results. In short, after working with Rotarians in Africa and South America to support Katie Spotz solo row across the Atlantic Ocean which raised over $100,000 for the Blue Planet Foundations' projects being reviewed in these PWX efforts, many in the Chagrin Valley Rotary Club see the wisdom of supporting efforts to engage interested local Rotarians in the US and foreign clubs to independently and regularly report on the progress of project implementation and realization of projected benefits. Working together at the
District and Club level, water and sanitation monitoring together may be a way to connect Rotarians long term.
With an international motto of Service above Self and over 1.2M members in 33,000 clubs worldwide, Rotary seems well positioned with potential local monitors who can provide and independent perspective particularly as to whether projected benefits are continuing months/years after project completion. Armed with a digital camera, a few simple instructions and local contact information, these Rotarians could provide regular feedback into a forum like PWX. Lessons learned from this information would seem to be invaluable to further improving this process and the probability of a improved long term results locally.
Finally, we were not aware of Don Howard's involvement and would like to hear his perspective. Also, Meru Kenya does have a Rotary club as you note. Perhaps an initial evaluation of a independent monitoring options could be tested in Rigoma Market/Keroka and then added as in integral part of the Meru program.
Keep up the focus on the local entrepreneurial model,
Roger

Independent service organization monitors?

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Mon 09 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Roger,

Thanks for your very interesting feedback and suggestions. I strongly agree with your statement about the importance of local follow up. From my experience, committed local oversight is the best option for the long term ownership and sustainability of the program. We also know that outsiders tend to receive very different answers when they conduct interviews and household surveys and our goal is to get the most honest feedback in order to continually improve the program.

I'll begin by giving you an overview of our current monitoring program. Our monitoring program in Rigoma Market/Keroka is carried out by ACI's 10 local Community Health Workers (CHWs) who operate independently from the local filter constructors. The CHWs are from the communities in which they work and local people trust them when they come to conduct tests on their filters and ask questions about their WASH situation. The CHWs will continue to conduct surveys (see attachment in the main proposal) on a random sample of households regularly and this is currently an affordable and workable option for ACI. We would be very interested in a fully independent monitoring procedure for our work, but for an organization of our size this could prove to be expensive. We are working with a professor from Hope College who is in the process of conducting an independent evaluation of the Aqua Clara program in Kenya.

We are very keen to explore the possibility of an independent monitoring program that would involve Rotary and I suggest that we discuss this by email or phone in the near future. My initial thoughts about testing the independent monitoring program in Rigoma Market/Keroka is that it would have to be done in conjunction with the local Community Health Workers. Although Kisumu is the location of the closest Rotary Club, there are tribal differences that would have to be taken into consideration as well as the distance. I hope that this does not sound negative - I am just thinking through some of the practicalities! Meru would certainly be a more straightforward proposition for these reasons. I believe that there are many ways that we can work with an Rotary in order to strengthen the Aqua Clara program and ultimately make a sustainable impact on the WASH crisis and I very much look forward to discussing this with you further.

We are determined to keep our focus on the local entrepreneurial model and continue to believe in its potential for growth and sustainability in the long term.

Best wishes,
Claire

Creating Demand?

By The Samburu Project Posted on Mon 02 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Claire,
The ACI program sounds like it is well constructed. One question though, do the sellers of the filters make any money on the transaction? I see that 820 Kenyan Shillings from each filter is paid back to ACI for the raw materials for the next one and 250 Kenyan Shillings goes to installation and maintenance. Together those add up to the whole price, so I am wondering how the seller makes any money.
Thanks,
Robert

Creating Demand?

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Tue 03 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Robert,
Thanks for your question. The filter constructer acts as the constructer, the seller and the installer, so he or she makes the 250 Kenyan shillings as profit. Hope that makes sense!
Claire

Creating Demand?

By The Samburu Project Posted on Wed 04 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Thanks Claire,
Two more questions for you:
1. Do the residents in Kisii have to travel far to get to sources of water?
2. How do you find the demand for filters (ie is it high or low)? I know that you have sold a decent amount and that you have determined that the price is affordable, but I am wondering about the people of the region's feelings about the filters. Do they see the need for them and desire to purchase them?
Thanks,
Robert

Creating Demand?

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Wed 04 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Robert,
1. From our household survey data and focus groups, we have found that people travel on average 40mins total to and from their water source. The most common sources are springs and surface water during the dry season, and we have found that a lot of people practice some sort of rain water harvesting during the wet season. This relatively short distance to the water source is one of the reasons that the program has been a good fit in this area as one of the conditions for proper filter function is regular and consistent use.
2. People are very positive about the ACI filters and about the program as a whole. The filter constructors currently have orders for 150 more filters and we predict that this number will continue to increase. People by and large seem to understand that their water needs to be treated to make it safe for drinking. From our focus groups and interviews, we have learned that people like the taste and clarity of the ACI filter water as compared to boiled water. Women in particular like the convenience and simplicity of biosand filtration as a water treatment option and have reported significant savings in time and money as they no longer need to procure firewood. People have reported that they were very keen to buy a filter after they tasted ACI filtered water in their neighbors' homes.
Thanks,
Claire

Creating Demand?

By The Samburu Project Posted on Wed 04 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Claire,
Sounds great. Sounds like your program has been very well designed. One more question: how long does it take for the business owners to produce a filter?
Thanks,
Robert

Creating Demand?

By Aqua Clara International Posted on Thu 05 Aug 2010, almost 16 years ago

Hi Robert,
It generally takes 15-20 minutes to construct the filter body and piping. The time consuming and labor intensive step is the preparation of the filler material (sieving and washing the sand and ballast). Part of the agreement with the purchasing household is that they participate in this step. This has a couple of advantages as their participation helps to keep the filter affordable while also increasing their understanding of how the filter works. To keep costs low, the filler material is either prepared at the purchasing household or at the local school where the tools and materials are stored - if it is prepared at the school it is the responsibility of the purchasing household to transport or carry the material to their home. A filter producer working with a household can produce 1-2 filters per day including installation and instruction time.
Best wishes,
Claire


Application Summary

Applicant :   Aqua Clara International
Status : approved_accepted
Country : KENYA Map

Funding

Amount Funded :   $28,490
Funded By:-
Schools for Water : $28,490
Funds Used
: $28,490
Funds Available
: $0

Projects Summary of Application

Number of Projects : 1
Overall Start Date : TODO!
Overall Completion Date : TODO!
Date of Last Update : 2012-11-19